Comparison

ZeroCMS vs Storyblok for Astro 2026.

ZeroCMS keeps your content in the repository. Storyblok moves it into a hosted store with an API. ZeroCMS leads on codebase footprint, AI and Astro fit. Storyblok leads on API reach, governance and publishing.

ZeroCMS

Git-based · Cloud · From $15 / month, editors need no seat

Connect a GitHub repository and Zero reads your Astro Zod schemas and .astro components to generate the editor — no plugins, no config, nothing added to your repository. Editors work against a live preview of the real site, and every publish lands as a clean commit. An AI agent works in the editor, and eight content checks run on demand or as a pre-publish gate.

Overview

  • Astro fit 5 of 5
  • Codebase fit 5 of 5
  • Editing 3 of 5
  • Publishing and review 4 of 5
  • Governance and access 2 of 5
  • Git and the repository — Not compared
  • APIs and extensibility 0 of 5
  • AI capabilities 5 of 5

Reviewed 1 Sep 2026 Full CMS comparison →

Storyblok

Headless · Cloud · Free tier · from $99 / month

Storyblok is a hosted headless CMS built around a block-based visual editor that previews your site as editors work. Content lives in Storyblok's cloud and reaches Astro through its content API and an official Astro SDK. The content model is defined in Storyblok's interface, separate from the repository, and pricing scales by seats and usage.

No screenshots yet

Overview

  • Astro fit 4 of 5
  • Codebase fit 0 of 5
  • Editing 4 of 5
  • Publishing and review 5 of 5
  • Governance and access 5 of 5
  • Git and the repository — Not compared
  • APIs and extensibility 5 of 5
  • AI capabilities 3 of 5

Reviewed 3 Sep 2026 Full CMS comparison →

Pick ZeroCMS when

You want a CMS that adds nothing to the repository and runs content checks before anything publishes.

  • AI agents edit the content
  • You want the CMS to leave your codebase alone
  • AI should do the routine work

Pick Storyblok when

You want a CMS that takes editorial comments in place and tracks what still needs translating.

  • Other systems read and write the content
  • The budget is zero
  • Roles, approvals and sign-in are policy

What actually differs.

Codebase fit

Code in your repository

ZeroCMS

Nothing. The editor is generated from the schemas and components already in the repository.

Storyblok

A dependency, an integration in your Astro config, credentials the repo and deploy carry, and fetching and rendering code you maintain.

AI capabilities

AI skills

ZeroCMS

You write your own skills for the agent.

Storyblok

No custom skills.

APIs and extensibility

REST API

ZeroCMS

No HTTP API. The content is files in the repository, and that is the interface.

Storyblok

A full HTTP API, reads and writes, for any consumer.

Governance and access

Single sign-on (SSO)

ZeroCMS

No SAML SSO yet.

Storyblok

SAML SSO is available.

Publishing and review

Scheduled publishing

ZeroCMS

No scheduled publishing.

Storyblok

A publish can be scheduled.

Editing

Custom field controls

ZeroCMS

No custom field controls.

Storyblok

Custom field controls are supported.

Astro fit

Content loading

ZeroCMS

As the files Astro's content collections already read. The repository is the backup.

Storyblok

Fetched through the vendor's SDK at build or request time.

Cost, licence and compliance

Customer-specific plans

ZeroCMS

Plans for agencies.

Storyblok

Plans for enterprise, education and non-profits.

Every aspect, side by side, in the full Astro CMS comparison →
Still not sure?

Zero adds nothing to the repository.

Storyblok adds four things to your repository. That matters if you want the repo left alone. Connect an Astro repo and see the difference in ten minutes.

14 days free · no credit card